No
sooner had the news on Dr.
Yunus and Grameen Bank being
awarded the Nobel Peace Prize
broken than the mood in the
nation turned festive. In
a country that has had few
successes worth the attention
of the international community
the recognition of a Bangladeshi
and his organization by the
Nobel Committee is indeed
a matter of national pride.
A survey conducted by The
Executive Times in Dhaka metropolitan
area finds that while many
respondents had not heard
of the Nobel Prize, now they
understood the significance
of it. And proud they were.
As Dr. Yunus himself puts
it, the Nobel Peace Prize
is a testament to the fact
that Bangladeshis are able
to contribute to the betterment
of humanity.
But recent political violence
has put a lid on the euphoria.
Within two weeks since the
Nobel Committee's announcement,
as the BNP-led alliance completed
its tenure, the streets in
Dhaka and other major cities
have turned into battle-fields
for activists of both the
ruling party alliance and
the opposition of the recent
past. Suddenly peace seemed
an odd fit in Bangladesh,
the spirit that "we-can-do-it-too"
quickly ebbing away.
Peace is harder to achieve,
violence much easier. And
one does not have to look
any further than the political
history of Bangladesh. In
our 15-year parliamentary
democracy, the two major political
parties have hardly come to
any agreement on national
issues and more often than
not the opposition have resorted
to non-cooperation movements
to press their demands. Now
the Caretaker Government,
led by the President, faces
the daunting task of not only
finding the modus operandi
for holding general election
within its 90-day tenure but
also creating a general perception
that , under its administration,
election, if held, will be
"free and fair."
Against this gloomy backdrop,
such recognition of Dr. Yunus
and Grameen Bank is highly
significant. That a Bangladeshi
and his organization have
made it to the list of Nobel
Peace Laureates should be
a reminder to us all that
we can resolve our problems
peacefully, political parties
notwithstanding.
For Dr. Yunus, the problem
was that the poor had little
chance of coming out of abject
poverty. The challenges he
faced were overwhelming. The
parameters were set by the
existing capitalist environment
that regarded the poor as
unworthy of credit. But through
his micro-credit initiative,
he proved the poor can be
responsible and have a place
in the capitalist system.
Dr. Yunus had to prove more-he
had to create a system that
can sustain itself. Grameen
Bank became the model, which
over the years has attained
remarkable efficiency, disproving
the critics who have questioned
how a bank that does so much
can remain cost effective.
Today, micro-credit stands
out to be an effective weapon
in the fight against poverty.
It stands out as a powerful
tool in achieving societal
harmony, reducing the tension
between "haves"
and "have-nots."
And Dr. Yunus achieved that
in peace with capitalism.
All he needed was passion,
diligence and perseverance,
and he had them all. |